History
  • No items yet
midpage
Noonan v. Snipes
569 So. 2d 1381
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1990
|
Check Treatment
569 So. 2d 1381 (1990)

William J. NOONAN, Appellant,
v.
Gary Michael SNIPES, Appellee.

No. 90-00900.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 21, 1990.

Philip N. Sherwin, Cape Coral, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's petition for adoption of appellee's sixteen-year-old son who is appellant's stepson.

Appellant contends in his brief that the trial court's ruling was against the manifest weight of the evidence. However, that contention is not directed to the applicable standard of appellate review in this context, which is whether there was substantial, competent evidence to support the trial court's ruling. See Tsavaris v. NCNB National Bank of Florida, 497 So. 2d 1338 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

While there was substantial, competent evidence in support of the petition, there was also substantial, competent evidence otherwise which supported the trial court's ruling. Under these circumstances an appellate court is not entitled to reweigh the evidence which was already weighed by the trial court. See DSA Group, Inc. v. Gonzalez, 555 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Tsavaris.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and RYDER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Noonan v. Snipes
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 21, 1990
Citation: 569 So. 2d 1381
Docket Number: 90-00900
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.