History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re the Discipline of Kimmel
1984 Minn. LEXIS 1334
| Minn. | 1984
|
Check Treatment
347 N.W.2d 52 (1984)

In the Matter of the Application for the Discipline of Harold D. KIMMEL, Jr., an Attorney at Law of the State of Minnesota.

No. C1-81-955.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 18, 1984.
Review Denied July 26, 1984.

ORDER

WHEREAS, by decision of this court filed July 23, 1982, In re Kimmel, 322 N.W.2d 224 (Minn.1982), respondent's practice has been restricted to examiner of titles throughout the remainder of his probation in connection with State of Minnesota v. Harold Dean Kimmel, Washington County, # 4479, Pine County # 64-25B; and

WHEREAS, by order of the Washington County District Court dated April 2, 1984, respondent was discharged from probation; and

WHEREAS, respondent has satisfied all current Continuing Legal Education requirements and has paid all past and current attorney registration fees;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, consistent with the original opinion of this court and upon the respondent's demonstrated satisfactory completion of the terms of the suspension from practice, respondent is reinstated to practice law. Minn.R.Law.Prof. Resp. 18 is deemed inapplicable to these proceedings.

Case Details

Case Name: In Re the Discipline of Kimmel
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Apr 18, 1984
Citation: 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1334
Docket Number: C1-81-955
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.