History
  • No items yet
midpage
Daniel v. State
865 So. 2d 661
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2004
|
Check Treatment
865 So.2d 661 (2004)

Troy E. DANIEL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D03-1514.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 18, 2004.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Andrea Norgard, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

COVINGTON, Judge.

Troy E. Daniel appeals the trial court's denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea. Daniel's motion alleged that his trial counsel misadvised him regarding sentencing. Because the record fails to show that Daniel is not entitled to relief, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing. See Snodgrass v. State, 837 So.2d 507, 508 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (citing State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235, 237 (Fla.1996)). Since a motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l) is a "critical stage" in which the defendant is entitled to effective assistance of counsel, Brown v. State, 835 So.2d 402, 403 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), we remand with directions that the trial court appoint conflict-free counsel for the evidentiary hearing.

Reversed and remanded.

SALCINES and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Daniel v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 18, 2004
Citation: 865 So. 2d 661
Docket Number: 2D03-1514
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.