History
  • No items yet
midpage
Estrada v. State
954 So. 2d 639
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2007
Check Treatment
954 So.2d 639 (2007)

Gonzalo ESTRADA, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D07-329.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 7, 2007.
Order Denying Rehearing and Clarifying Conflict May 16, 2007.

Gonzalo Estrada, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Spera v. State, 923 So.2d 543 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

STONE, POLEN and MAY, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION TO CERTIFY CONFLICT

PER CURIAM.

We deny appellant's motion for rehearing but grant his motion to certify conflict. As our affirmance was based in part on Spera v. State, 923 So.2d 543 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), as we did in Spera, we certify conflict with Keevis v. State, 908 So.2d 552 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

STONE, POLEN and MAY, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Estrada v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 16, 2007
Citation: 954 So. 2d 639
Docket Number: 4D07-329
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.