History
  • No items yet
midpage
Armour v. State of Ohio
775 F. Supp. 1090
| N.D. Ohio | 1991
|
Check Treatment
775 F.Supp. 1090 (1991)

Ezell ARMOUR, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
The STATE of OHIO, et al., Defendants.

No. 88CV1104Y.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D.

September 4, 1991.

Percy Squire, Bernadette J. Bollas, Bricker & Eckler, Columbus, Ohio, Robert A. Douglas, Sr., Youngstown, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

Andrew I. Sutter, Catherine M. Cola, Theresa R. Schaefer, Atty. Gens. Office, Columbus, Ohio, for defendants.

Before NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge, JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge, and BATCHELDER, District Judge.

ORDER

BATCHELDER, District Judge.

Because the majority's ruling in this case requires that the Court retain jurisdiction over this matter pending the drawing of new district lines for the Ohio House of Representatives districts, this case now presents the potential for a conflict of interest for me. Accordingly, I hereby recuse myself from any further participation in the matter, and I have this day advised the Chief Judge of the Circuit of this in order that he may determine whether another judge of the District Court shall be appointed to serve on this panel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case Details

Case Name: Armour v. State of Ohio
Court Name: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Date Published: Sep 4, 1991
Citation: 775 F. Supp. 1090
Docket Number: 88CV1104Y
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.