History
  • No items yet
midpage
Higgins v. Schneider
164 A.2d 299
| N.J. | 1960
|
Check Treatment
33 N.J. 299 (1960)
164 A.2d 299

TIMOTHY HIGGINS, AN INFANT, ETC., PLAINTIFF, AND CHARLES A. HIGGINS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM A. SCHNEIDER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 27, 1960.
Decided October 10, 1960.

Mr. Stanley W. Greenfield argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Edward C. Hillis argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Marley, Winkelried & Hillis, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Haneman in the court below.

Mr. Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Mr. Justice SCHETTINO vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Freund.

For affirmance — Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR and HALL — 5.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justice SCHETTINO — 2.

Case Details

Case Name: Higgins v. Schneider
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Oct 10, 1960
Citation: 164 A.2d 299
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.