History
  • No items yet
midpage
McGlynn v. Schultz
235 A.2d 901
| N.J. | 1967
|
Check Treatment
50 N.J. 409 (1967)
235 A.2d 901

ROGER H. McGLYNN, RECEIVER OF NEPTUNE CENTER ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MORTIMER L. SCHULTZ, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND DAVID H. JACKSON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS, AND JACK E. PORTIS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

December 4, 1967.

Messrs. Zucker, Lowenstein, Gurny, & Zucker; Messrs. Waldor & Hochberg; Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Kipp; Mr. Richard L. Amster; and Messrs. Frohling & Gaulkin for the petitioners.

Messrs. Hannoch, Weisman, Stern & Besser and Mr. James J. Shrager for the plaintiff-respondent.

Denied.

Case Details

Case Name: McGlynn v. Schultz
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Dec 4, 1967
Citation: 235 A.2d 901
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.