History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gottfried v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
414 A.2d 544
N.J.
1980
Check Treatment
82 N.J. 478 (1980)
414 A.2d 544

LEONORA R. GOTTFRIED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA AND THE PENN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 20, 1980.
Decided March 28, 1980.

*481 Richard H. Thiele, Jr., argued the cause for appellant.

William L. Dill, Jr., argued the cause for respondents (Stryker, Tams & Dill, attorneys; James D. Ferrucci and Charles H. Friederich on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Kole in the Appellate Division, reported at 173 N.J. Super. 381 (1979).

For reversal — Justices SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHRIEBER and HANDLER — 5.

For affirmance — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Gottfried v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Mar 28, 1980
Citation: 414 A.2d 544
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.