History
  • No items yet
midpage
Secallus v. Muscarelle
126 N.J. 288
| N.J. | 1991
|
Check Treatment
126 N.J. 288 (1991)
597 A.2d 1083

GARY SECALLUS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOSEPH L. MUSCARELLE, A/K/A JOSEPH L. MUSCARELLE AND SONS, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
STEEL STRUCTURES CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND DOW JONES AND COMPANY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 9, 1991.
Decided October 31, 1991.

Michael B. Oropollo argued the cause for appellant (Hoagland, Longo, Oropollo & Moran, attorneys; Robert F. Colquhoun, II, on the brief).

Donald L. Letizia argued the cause for respondent (Brian Granstrand, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 245 N.J. Super. 535, 586 A.2d 305 (1991).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, and STEIN — 7.

Case Details

Case Name: Secallus v. Muscarelle
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Oct 31, 1991
Citation: 126 N.J. 288
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.