History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sikes v. Township of Rockaway
138 N.J. 41
| N.J. | 1994
|
Check Treatment
138 N.J. 41 (1994)
648 A.2d 482

DONALD R. SIKES, JR., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF ROCKAWAY AND JOHN C. DOLL, JR., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 11, 1994.
Decided October 27, 1994.

James J. Higgins argued the cause for appellant (Boyar, Higgins & Suozzo, attorneys).

*42 Paul M. Selitto argued the cause for respondent (Pitman, Senesky, Nicola & Selitto, attorneys).

PER CURIAM

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 269 N.J. Super. 463, 635 A.2d 1004 (1994).

For Affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

Opposed — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Sikes v. Township of Rockaway
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Oct 27, 1994
Citation: 138 N.J. 41
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.