History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
83 A.2d 774
| N.J. | 1951
|
Check Treatment
8 N.J. 85 (1951)
83 A.2d 774

PENNSYLVANIA-READING SEASHORE LINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 15, 1951.
Decided October 22, 1951.

Mr. John Lloyd, Jr., argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Lloyd & Horn, attorneys).

Mr. Frank A. Mathews, Jr., argued the cause for the respondents (Mr. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney-General).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Eastwood in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON — 5.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Oct 22, 1951
Citation: 83 A.2d 774
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.