History
  • No items yet
midpage
Herrera v. Heinze
1963 U.S. LEXIS 535
| SCOTUS | 1963
|
Check Treatment
375 U.S. 26 (1963)

HERRERA
v.
HEINZE, WARDEN.

No. 82, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 14, 1963.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Edsel W. Haws, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, for the reasons stated in Daegele v. Kansas, ante, p. 1, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.

Case Details

Case Name: Herrera v. Heinze
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 14, 1963
Citation: 1963 U.S. LEXIS 535
Docket Number: 82 M
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.