History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ardis v. Reed
214 A.2d 313
| N.J. | 1965
|
Check Treatment
46 N.J. 1 (1965)
214 A.2d 313

MICHAEL ARDIS AND DANIEL EILE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CARLTON THOMAS REED, A/K/A CARLTON REED, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 26, 1965.
Decided November 8, 1965.

Mr. Howard A. Goldberger argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Goldberger, Ostrow, Siegel & Finn, attorneys).

Mr. George P. Moser, Jr. argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Moser, Roveto & McGough, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Collester in the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Ardis v. Reed
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Nov 8, 1965
Citation: 214 A.2d 313
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.