History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schnell v. Township of Millburn
328 A.2d 624
| N.J. | 1974
|
Check Treatment
66 N.J. 137 (1974)
328 A.2d 624

FREDDIE SCHNELL, ELECTRO-PROTECTIVE CORPORATION AND SUPREME SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF MILLBURN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND WELLS FARGO SIGNAL SYSTEMS, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 18, 1974.
Decided December 4, 1974.

Mr. Michael R. Griffinger and Mr. David M. Hyman, argued the cause for appellants, (Crummy, Del Deo, Dolan *138 and Purcell, attorneys for Wells Fargo Signal Systems, and Mr. Eugene T. O'Toole, attorney for Township of Millburn).

Mr. Sidney Krieger argued the cause for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. 127 N.J. Super. 155.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices JACOBS, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD and Judge COLLESTER — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Schnell v. Township of Millburn
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Dec 4, 1974
Citation: 328 A.2d 624
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.