History
  • No items yet
midpage
Firtag v. Gendleman
152 F. Supp. 226
| D.D.C. | 1957
|
Check Treatment
152 F. Supp. 226 (1957)

Gabriel FIRTAG et ux., Plaintiffs,
v.
Maurice J. GENDLEMAN, et al., Co-Partners, Trading as Auburn Esso Service, Defendants.

Civ. A. No. 2370-55.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

June 6, 1957.

Earl H. Davis, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

Justin L. Edgerton, of Washington, D. C., for defendants.

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

This is a motion to retax costs. The Court is of the opinion that the following items are not taxable as costs:

Fees of expert witnesses in excess of the statutory witness fees.

Cost of copies of depositions obtained for counsel's use as distinguished from the cost of the original deposition.

Cost of a transcript of the proceedings at the trial, be it an entire transcript or partial. It is a taxable item only if the transcript is ordered by the court. It is not taxable if counsel orders it for his own use.

In view of these considerations the action of the clerk in disallowing the above items is sustained and the motion to retax costs is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Firtag v. Gendleman
Court Name: District Court, District of Columbia
Date Published: Jun 6, 1957
Citation: 152 F. Supp. 226
Docket Number: Civ. A. No. 2370-55
Court Abbreviation: D.D.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.