History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. State
2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1889
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2005
|
Check Treatment
180 S.W.3d 50 (2005)

Belinda WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 85990.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

December 20, 2005.

Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Deborah Daniels, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Belinda Williams, appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that her trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance during cross-examination of movant's daughter.

The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 20, 2005
Citation: 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1889
Docket Number: ED 85990
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.