History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bing v. Bowers
26 F.2d 1017
| 2d Cir. | 1928
|
Check Treatment
26 F.2d 1017 (1928)

Leo S. BING, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Frank K. BOWERS, Collector of United States Internal Revenue, Defendant in Error.
Leo S. BING, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Charles W. ANDERSON, Collector of United States Internal Revenue, Defendant in Error.

Nos. 322, 323.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 18, 1928.

M. S. & I. S. Isaacs, of New York City (John W. Davis, Lewis M. Isaacs, and Blount Ralls, all of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

Charles H. Tuttle, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Nathan R. Margold, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for defendants in error.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgments affirmed, upon the opinion of Mack, J., below. 22 F.(2d) 450.

Case Details

Case Name: Bing v. Bowers
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Jun 18, 1928
Citation: 26 F.2d 1017
Docket Number: 322, 323
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.