History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Bell
598 F.3d 366
| 7th Cir. | 2010
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before C UDAHY , W OOD , and E VANS , Circuit Judges . P ER C URIAM . The government has filed a petition for rehearing seeking affirmance of this case on the basis of application note 4(B) to Guideline Section 1B1.1.

This application note was not cited by the government in its briefing of this case, nor did the government cite any case applying application note 4(B) nor make an *2 2 No. 09-2555 argument based on this application note. Therefore, the argument has been forfeited and the matter does not qualify for possible treatment as plain error.

We express no opinion on the meaning and effect of application note 4(B) in the present circumstances.

As no judge of the panel has voted to grant it, the petition for rehearing is D ENIED .

5-19-10

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Bell
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Date Published: May 19, 2010
Citation: 598 F.3d 366
Docket Number: 09-2555
Court Abbreviation: 7th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.