History
  • No items yet
midpage
Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.
158 A.2d 528
| N.J. | 1960
|
Check Treatment
31 N.J. 591 (1960)
158 A.2d 528

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SAV-ON-DRUGS, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 22, 1960.
Decided March 7, 1960.

Mr. Melvin P. Antell argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Lorentz & Stamler, attorneys).

Mr. Warren E. Dunn argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Lum, Fairlie & Foster, attorneys; Mr. Claus Motulsky, of the New York bar, on the brief).

Mr. Murry Brochin argued the cause for the State of New Jersey, intervenor (Mr. David D. Furman, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Scherer in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR and SCHETTINO — 6.

For reversal — Justice HALL — 1.

Case Details

Case Name: Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Mar 7, 1960
Citation: 158 A.2d 528
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.