History
  • No items yet
midpage
PENNSBURY VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, LLC v. McIntyre
600 Pa. 369
Pa.
2009
Check Treatment
966 A.2d 547 (2009)

PENNSBURY VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, LLC, Petitioner
v.
Aaron McINTYRE, Alma Forsyth and John Doe, Respondents.

No. 410 MAL 2008.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 29, 2009.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of January 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as framed by Petitioner, are:

1. Did the Commonwealth Court ruling render settlement contracts resolving land use disputes which arguably relate to an environmental law or regulation unenforceable and deprive citizens of the right to resolve their disputes via settlement agreements?
2. Did the Commonwealth Court err in applying and analyzing the Environmental Immunity Act in the instant matter in which the purposes of the Act were not implicated?
3. Did the Commonwealth Court misapply the Environmental Immunity Act by holding that a deed restriction is an environmental law or regulation?
4. Did the Commonwealth Court err in applying and analyzing the Environmental Immunity Act by holding that the business relationship exception to the Act did not apply to this case?

Case Details

Case Name: PENNSBURY VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, LLC v. McIntyre
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 29, 2009
Citation: 600 Pa. 369
Docket Number: 410 MAL 2008
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.