History
  • No items yet
midpage
Warner-Lambert Co. v. Kent
170 L. Ed. 2d 51
| SCOTUS | 2008
|
Check Treatment

*1 (Slip Opinion) Cite as: 552 U. S. ____ (2008) 1

Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash- ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

_________________ No. 06–1498 _________________ WARNER-LAMBERT CO., LLC, ET AL ., PETITIONERS v.

KIMBERLY KENT ET AL . ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF

APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT [March 3, 2008] P ER C URIAM .

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. T HE C HIEF J USTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Warner-Lambert Co. v. Kent
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 3, 2008
Citation: 170 L. Ed. 2d 51
Docket Number: 06-1498
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.