History
  • No items yet
midpage
Do Sung Uhm v. Humana Inc.
2009 WL 2170696
| 9th Cir. | 2009
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
573 F.3d 865 (2009)

DO SUNG UHM; Eun Sook Uhm, a married couple, individually and for all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
HUMANA INC., a Delaware corporation; Humana Health Plan Inc., a Kentucky corporation doing business as Humana, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-35672.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 22, 2009.

Scott C. Breneman, Breneman Law Firm, Joseph Andrew Grube, Ricci Grube Aita, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Brian D. Boyle, Mark Davies, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, DC, Mary Rebecca Knack, Williams Kastner & Gibbs, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: B. FLETCHER, RICHARD A. PAEZ and MARSHA S. BERZON,[*] Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Appellees' request for reconsideration shall be treated as a petition for panel rehearing and is GRANTED. The opinion filed on August 25, 2008 and reported at 540 F.3d 980 (9th Cir.2008) is WITHDRAWN and shall not be cited as precedent. The petition for rehearing en banc is moot. The panel will file a new disposition in due course.

NOTES

[*] Due to the unavailability of Senior District Judge William Schwarzer, Judge Berzon has been randomly drawn as a replacement judge.

Case Details

Case Name: Do Sung Uhm v. Humana Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 22, 2009
Citation: 2009 WL 2170696
Docket Number: 06-35672
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.