History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.
89 A.2d 242
| N.J. | 1952
|
Check Treatment
9 N.J. 605 (1952)
89 A.2d 242

MAYFLOWER INDUSTRIES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THOR CORPORATION, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, AND TELDISCO, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued June 9, 1952.
Decided June 16, 1952.

Mr. Meyer E. Ruback argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Ruback, Albach & Weisman and Mr. Alfred C. Clapp, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas J. Brogan argued the cause for the respondent Thor Corporation.

Mr. Sol D. Kapelsohn argued the cause for the respondent Teldisco, Inc. (Messrs. Kapelsohn, Lerner, Leuchter & Reitman, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The orders will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinions of Judge Francis in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 6.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 16, 1952
Citation: 89 A.2d 242
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.