History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Finkle
66 N.J. 139
| N.J. | 1974
|
Check Treatment
66 N.J. 139 (1974)
329 A.2d 65

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
HAROLD FINKLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 18, 1974.
Decided December 4, 1974.

Mr. Harold Finkle, of the New York Bar, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Morgan E. Thomas, attorney).

Mr. Robert A. Rubenfeld, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. 128 N.J. Super. 199.

CLIFFORD, J., concurs in the result.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices JACOBS, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and Judge COLLESTER — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Finkle
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Dec 4, 1974
Citation: 66 N.J. 139
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.