History
  • No items yet
midpage
Powell v. Ingram
231 N.C. 427
| N.C. | 1950
|
Check Treatment
57 S.E.2d 315 (1950)
231 N.C. 427

POWELL
v.
INGRAM et al.
STANCELL
v.
INGRAM et al.

No. 751.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 1950.

John T. Manning and Egbert L. Haywood, Durham, for plaintiffs, appellants.

Spears & Hall, Durham, for defendant, John T. Ingram, Jr., appellee.

T. Lacy Williams, Raleigh, and Fuller, Reade, Umstead & Fuller, Durham, for defendant, Bernard Carroll, appellee.

PER CURIAM.

A careful consideration of the record and case on appeal leaves us with the firm conviction that the trial in the court below conformed to all applicable legal principles. As no error in law appears, the verdict and judgment must be upheld. The question of the liability of Sanders to the plaintiffs was not at issue on the trial, and in consequence the judgment does not preclude the plaintiffs from suing Sanders in case they desire to do so.

No error.

Case Details

Case Name: Powell v. Ingram
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Feb 3, 1950
Citation: 231 N.C. 427
Docket Number: 751
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.