History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Gill
327 S.C. 253
| S.C. | 1997
|
Check Treatment
327 S.C. 253 (1997)
489 S.E.2d 478

The STATE, Respondent,
v.
Michael Jerrod GILL, Petitioner.

No. 24670.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard October 1, 1996.
Decided August 11, 1997.

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of South Carolina Office of Appellate Defense, Columbia, for petitioner.

Attorney General Charles Molony Condon, Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Attorney General Caroline Callison Tiffin, Columbia; and Solicitor Thomas E. Pope, York, for respondent.

*254 PER CURIAM:

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' decision denying petitioner relief, by a vote of two-to-one, on his Batson[1] claim. State v. Gill, 319 S.C. 283, 460 S.E.2d 412 (Ct.App.1995). We find the Court of Appeals erred in reaching the Batson "mixed motive" issue because it was not properly preserved for appeal, never having been raised to or ruled upon by the trial judge, see, e.g., Smith v. Phillips, 318 S.C. 453, 458 S.E.2d 427 (1995).

Accordingly, we vacate the decision of the Court of Appeals, and affirm petitioner's conviction.

NOTES

[1] Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S. Ct. 1712, 90 L. Ed. 2d 69 (1986).

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Gill
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Aug 11, 1997
Citation: 327 S.C. 253
Docket Number: 24670
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.