History
  • No items yet
midpage
Crawford v. Central Bonded Warehouse
140 S.E.2d 548
| N.C. | 1965
|
Check Treatment
140 S.E.2d 548 (1965)
263 N.C. 826

Clarence CRAWFORD, Employee,
v.
CENTRAL BONDED WAREHOUSE, DIVISION OF BAYSIDE WAREHOUSE COMPANY, Employer, and Phoenix Assurance of New York, Carrier.

No. 205.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 1965.

*549 O. A. Warren and Whitener & Mitchen, Gastonia, for plaintiff.

Grier, Parker, Poe & Thompson and Gaston H. Gage, Charlotte, for defendants.

PER CURIAM.

The facts found by the Commission are supported by competent evidence. G. S. § 97-86. These findings of fact are conclusive on appeal even though there may be evidence contra. Taylor v. Queen City Club, 260 N.C. 435, 132 S.E.2d 865. The findings of fact support the conclusions and the Opinion and Award of the Full Commission. Where an idiopathic condition of a workman is the sole cause of the injury, compensation may not be awarded. Cole v. Guilford County, 259 N.C. 724, 131 S.E.2d 308.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Crawford v. Central Bonded Warehouse
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 3, 1965
Citation: 140 S.E.2d 548
Docket Number: 205
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.