History
  • No items yet
midpage
Finch v. City of Durham
325 N.C. 714
| N.C. | 1989
|
Check Treatment
388 S.E.2d 452 (1989)
325 N.C. 714

Vernon FINCH, Juaita Finch, Daniel J. Bullard and Christine Bullard
v.
The CITY OF DURHAM, North Carolina.

No. 85PA89.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 1989.

*453 Karen A. Sindelar, Asst. City Atty., for City of Durham.

Mount, White, Hutson & Carden, Maxwell, Martin, Freeman & Beason, Durham, for plaintiffs.

S. Ellis Hankins, Gen. Counsel, Wilmington, Andrew L. Romanet, Jr., Asst. Gen. Counsel, Raleigh, for NC League of Municipalities.

Thomas C. Pollard, City Atty., Robert W. Oast, Jr., Asst. City Atty., Chapel Hill, for City of Wilmington.

Henry W. Underbill, Jr., City Atty., Charlotte, Jesse L. Warren, City Atty., Greensboro, for City of Charlotte and City of Greensboro.

Harry H. Harkins, Jr., Durham, for Watts Hospital-Hillandale Neighborhood Assoc.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th day of December 1989."

Case Details

Case Name: Finch v. City of Durham
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Dec 7, 1989
Citation: 325 N.C. 714
Docket Number: 85PA89
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.