History
  • No items yet
midpage
Walport v. Walport
646 P.2d 1215
| Nev. | 1982
|
Check Treatment
646 P.2d 1215 (1982)

Edward E. WALPORT, Appellant,
v.
Elizabeth J. WALPORT, Respondent.

No. 13639.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

June 25, 1982.

Robert C. LePome, Las Vegas, for appellant.

Elizabeth J. Walport, in pro. per.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

On January 20, 1982, respondent was granted 30 days in which to obtain counsel, and 60 days in which to file her brief in this matter. Respondent failed to comply with that order. On April 5, 1982, we entered an order, sua sponte, granting respondent an additional 30 days to obtain counsel and to file her brief in this matter. Respondent was, at that time, informed that failure to comply with our order might be treated by the court as a confession of error and appropriate disposition of the appeal made. Nevertheless, respondent has not filed an answering brief and, apparently, has not retained counsel.

We choose to treat respondent's conduct as a confession of error. NRAP 31(c); Rockwell v. Rockwell, 98 Nev. 80, 640 P.2d 1318 (1982). Accordingly, we reverse the order denying appellant's motion to modify the decree of divorce in this matter, and we remand to the district court for further proceedings.

Case Details

Case Name: Walport v. Walport
Court Name: Nevada Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 25, 1982
Citation: 646 P.2d 1215
Docket Number: 13639
Court Abbreviation: Nev.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.