History
  • No items yet
midpage
Robinson v. State
175 S.W.3d 183
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2005
|
Check Treatment
175 S.W.3d 183 (2005)

Kenneth ROBINSON, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. ED 85409.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

November 1, 2005.

N. Scott Rosenblum, Rosenblum, Schwartz, Rogers & Glass, P.C., Clayton, MO, for appellant.

Richard A. Starnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Kenneth Robinson, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Robinson v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 1, 2005
Citation: 175 S.W.3d 183
Docket Number: ED 85409
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.