History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Alston
72 S.E.2d 686
| N.C. | 1952
|
Check Treatment
72 S.E.2d 686 (1952)
236 N.C. 299

STATE
v.
ALSTON.

No. 222.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 8, 1952.

Harry McMullan, Atty. Gen., and T. W. Bruton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

H. F. Seawell, Jr., Carthage, and J. W. Hoyle, Sanford, for defendant, appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The record indicates that the judgment was pronounced and entered without warrant or indictment, or waiver thereof, G.S. § 15-140, and without arraignment, plea, or the intervention of a jury. It necessarily follows, then, that the judgment is void. This is conceded by the State. The judgment will be vacated and set aside. Of course, the Solicitor may send a bill, if so advised.

Reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Alston
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Oct 8, 1952
Citation: 72 S.E.2d 686
Docket Number: 222
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.