History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hunt v. Connecticut
1968 U.S. LEXIS 1365
| SCOTUS | 1968
|
Check Treatment
392 U.S. 304 (1968)

HUNT
v.
CONNECTICUT.

No. 117, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 10, 1968.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT.

James W. Marshall for petitioner.

David B. Salzman for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Connecticut is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Case Details

Case Name: Hunt v. Connecticut
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 10, 1968
Citation: 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1365
Docket Number: 117 M
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.