History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roberts v. Moore
332 S.C. 488
| S.C. | 1998
|
Check Treatment
332 S.C. 488 (1998)
505 S.E.2d 593

Sammy D. ROBERTS, Petitioner,
v.
Michael MOORE, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, and Charles M. Condon, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

September 3, 1998.

ORDER

Respondents filed a motion seeking to have the Clerk of Court issue an execution notice. See S.C.Code Ann. § 17-25-370 (1985). Petitioner, in response, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

We deny the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Regarding respondents' motion, the Clerk shall issue an execution notice as provided by In re Stays of Execution in Capital Cases, 321 S.C. 544, 471 S.E.2d 140 (1996).

We take this opportunity to state that it is a ministerial duty of the Clerk of this Court to issue an execution notice pursuant to § 17-25-370. Accordingly, it is not necessary for a formal motion to be made to the Court requesting the issuance of the execution notice. In the future, if respondents believe the circumstances warrant the issuance of the notice, they may notify the Clerk by letter, with a copy sent to the appropriate parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ James E. Moore, Acting C.J. /s/ John H. Waller, Jr., J. /s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J.

FINNEY, C.J., and TOAL, J., not participating.

Case Details

Case Name: Roberts v. Moore
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Sep 3, 1998
Citation: 332 S.C. 488
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.