History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Holder
113 S.E.2d 15
| N.C. | 1960
|
Check Treatment
113 S.E.2d 15 (1960)
252 N.C. 121

STATE
v.
Forest M. HOLDER.

No. 145.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 2, 1960.

Malcolm B. Seawell, Atty. Gen., Glenn L. Hooper, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Mullen, Holland & Cooke, Gastonia, by Frank P. Cooke, Gastonia, for defendant, appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant asked for a new trial solely upon the ground that the court committed *16 error in recapitulating the defendant's evidence and contentions and that he was prejudiced by the reference to the treatment for alcoholism.

Inadvertence in stating the contentions or in recapitulating the evidence must be called to the attention of the court in time for correction. After verdict the objection comes too late. State v. Adams, 245 N.C. 344, 95 S.E.2d 902.

No error.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Holder
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 2, 1960
Citation: 113 S.E.2d 15
Docket Number: 145
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.