History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brudenell v. Vaux
1794 U.S. App. LEXIS 25
| SCOTUS | 1794
|
Check Treatment
2 U.S. 302 (____)
2 Dall. 302

BRUDENELL et al.
versus
VAUX et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

Present WILSON and PETERS, Justices.

Lewis & Tilghman, for the plaintiff. Ingersoll, Rawle, & Thomas, for the defendant.

THE question in this cause arose upon the act of Assembly for recording Mortgages (1 Vol. Dall. Edit. p. 112) the mortgage of the defendants having been recorded after the expiration of six Lunar, but within six Calendar, months, from the date: And THE COURT, having compared this, with other acts of the Legislature, were of opinion, that by the word "months," Calendar months were intended.

Case Details

Case Name: Brudenell v. Vaux
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Apr 1, 1794
Citation: 1794 U.S. App. LEXIS 25
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.