History
  • No items yet
midpage
Westfall v. Rust International
312 Or. 34
| Or. | 1991
|
Check Treatment
815 P.2d 1272 (1991)
312 Or. 34

In the matter of the Compensation of Randy R. WESTFALL, Claimant.
Randy R. Westfall, Petitioner On Review,
v.
RUST INTERNATIONAL and Underwriters Adjusting Company, Respondents On Review.

WCB 88-01147; CA A62442; SC S37923.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

On Petition for Review March 6, 1991.[*]
Decided August 22, 1991.

David C. Force of Vick & Gutzler, Salem, filed the petition, for petitioner on review.

Bradley R. Scheminske of Scheminske & Lyons, Portland, filed the response, for respondents on review.

David Gernant, Portland, filed a brief for amicus curiae Or. Trial Lawyers Ass'n.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, 107 Or. App. 395, 812 P.2d 31, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of this court's opinion in Mattiza v. Foster, 311 Or. 1, 803 P.2d 723 (1990).

NOTES

[*] Appeal from the Court of Appeals' Order Awarding Attorney Fee dated January 30, 1991.

Case Details

Case Name: Westfall v. Rust International
Court Name: Oregon Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 22, 1991
Citation: 312 Or. 34
Docket Number: WCB 88-01147 CA A62442 SC S37923
Court Abbreviation: Or.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.