History
  • No items yet
midpage
Linkline Communications, Inc. v. Sbc California, Inc.
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8235
| 9th Cir. | 2009
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
563 F.3d 853 (2009)

LINKLINE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; Inreach Internet LLC; OM Networks, dba Omsoft Technologies, Inc.; Nitelog, Inc., dba Red Shift Internet Services, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
SBC CALIFORNIA, INC., fka Pacific Bell Telephone Company; Pacific Bell Internet Services; SBC Advanced Solutions, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 05-56023.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 9, 2009.

Maxwell M. Blecher, Esquire, Gary M. Joye, Esquire, Blecher & Collins, P.C., Los Angeles, CA, David Andrew Simpson, Esquire, Simpson Partners, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Craig Stewart, Jones Day, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before: SIDNEY R. THOMAS, KIM McLANE WARDLAW, and RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

In light of the Supreme Court's opinion in Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Linkline Communications, Inc., ___ U.S. ___, 129 S. Ct. 1109, 172 L. Ed. 2d 836 (2009), we vacate our prior opinion in LinkLine Communications, Inc. v. SBC California, Inc., 503 F.3d 876 (9th Cir.2007) and remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court decision, including but not limited to, its consideration of proposed amendments to the complaint.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

REMANDED.

Case Details

Case Name: Linkline Communications, Inc. v. Sbc California, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 9, 2009
Citation: 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8235
Docket Number: 05-56023
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.