WILLADSEN
v.
WILLADSEN.

John N. Crudup. for appellant.

Whelchel, Dunlap & Gignilliat, Weyman H. Forrester, for appellee.

JORDAN, Justice.

This appeal from the grant of a divorce is without merit.

The trial judge heard the case without a jury. His judgment does not disclose any details of the evidence adduced or what rulings were made in respect thereto. The appeal is unaccompanied by a transcript of the proceedings or an acceptable substitute and none appears to be available. The only errors argued and insisted upon, a ruling on the admissibility of testimony and the refusal to grant a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, necessarily require a consideration of what transpired at the trial.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.