History
  • No items yet
midpage
Donnell v. Cox
240 N.C. 259
| N.C. | 1954
|
Check Treatment
81 S.E.2d 664 (1954)
240 N.C. 259

DONNELL
v.
COX et al.

No. 595.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 5, 1954.

Stevens, Burgwin & McGhee, Wilmington, for plaintiff appellee.

M. C. McLeod, Rockingham, for defendant appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant assigns as error the findings of fact by the court below. However, the assignment is not supported by an exception to such findings, therefore, it is feckless. Worsley v. S. & W. Rendering Co., 239 N.C. 547, 80 S.E.2d 467; Wyatt v. Sharp, 239 N.C. 655, 80 S.E.2d 762. Moreover, when no exception is taken to findings of fact, they are presumed to be supported by the evidence and are binding on appeal. Wyatt v. Sharp, supra, and cases cited therein.

The ruling of the court below is

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Donnell v. Cox
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: May 5, 1954
Citation: 240 N.C. 259
Docket Number: 595
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.