History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Ritch
292 S.C. 75
| S.C. | 1987
|
Check Treatment
292 S.C. 75 (1987)
354 S.E.2d 909

The STATE, Respondent
v.
Rodney Lee RITCH, Appellant.

22706

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Submitted December 17, 1986.
Decided April 13, 1987.

*76 Asst. Appellate Defender Tara D. Shurling, of S.C. Office of Appellate Defense, Columbia, for appellant.

Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock, Asst. Atty. Gen. Harold M. Coombs, Jr., Columbia, and Sol. Holman C. Gossett, Spartanburg, for respondent.

Submitted Dec. 17, 1986.

Decided April 13, 1987.

Per Curiam:

Appellant contends that the trial judge erred in proceeding with his trial in absentia. We agree.

The trial judge failed to find that appellant had received notice of his right to be present at trial and a warning that he would be tried in his absence should he fail to attend, as required by Criminal Practice Rule 3. This was an error. State v. Jackson, 288 S.C. 94, 341 S.E. (2d) 375 (1986); State v. Fleming, 287 S.C. 268, 335 S.E. (2d) 814 (Ct. App. 1985). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

CHANDLER, J., not participating.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Ritch
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Apr 13, 1987
Citation: 292 S.C. 75
Docket Number: 22706
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.