History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dunkley v. Shoemate
346 N.C. 274
N.C.
1997
Check Treatment
485 S.E.2d 295 (1997)

Rebecca DUNKLEY
v.
Lee H. SHOEMATE, Eric B. Munson, David S. Janowsky, Preston A. Walker, Mary F. Lutz, Doe One, Doe Two, and Doe Three.

No. 28PA97.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 6, 1997.

Law Offices of Grover C. McCain, Jr. by Grover C. McCain, Jr., and Frank W. Hallstrom, Chapel Hill, for plaintiff-appellant.

Patterson, Dilthey, Clay & Bryson, L.L.P. by Robert M. Clay, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee Shoemate.

Bailey & Dixon, L.L.P. by Gary S. Parsons and Kenyann G. Brown, Raleigh, on behalf of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and the Alliance of American Insurers, amici curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The interlocutory order of the superior court, from which the plaintiff appealed, affects a substantial right which the plaintiff will lose if the order is not reviewed before final judgment. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc., 294 N.C. 200, 240 S.E.2d 338 (1978); Highway Commission v. Nuckles, 271 N.C. 1, 155 S.E.2d 772 (1967). It was error to dismiss the appeal. We reverse the order dismissing the appeal and remand to the Court of Appeals for a hearing on the merits.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Case Details

Case Name: Dunkley v. Shoemate
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 6, 1997
Citation: 346 N.C. 274
Docket Number: 28PA97
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.