History
  • No items yet
midpage
Strickland v. State
693 So. 2d 1142
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1997
|
Check Treatment
693 So.2d 1142 (1997)

Ronnie STRICKLAND, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 96-2053.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 22, 1997.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Michael A. Wasserman, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant's sentence but strike the attorney fee imposed because appellant was not informed that he had a right to challenge the assessment, which is fundamental error. See Neal v. State, 688 So.2d 392, 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)("[T]he state overlooks the fact that the supreme court has held that it is `fundamental' error to order a criminal defendant to pay attorney fees without affording adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard."). The fee may again be imposed on remand provided appellant is afforded adequate notice and an opportunity to contest its amount. Brock v. State, 667 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

MINER, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Strickland v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 22, 1997
Citation: 693 So. 2d 1142
Docket Number: 96-2053
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.