32:T4b5,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"Verburg v. Verburg, 8 Or. App. 524","datePublished":"1972-03-23","legislationDate":"1972-03-23","citation":"Verburg v. Verburg, 8 Or. App. 524 (Or. Ct. App. 1972)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Court of Appeals of Oregon","description":"Read the full text of Verburg v. Verburg (Verburg v. Verburg, 8 Or. App. 524 (Or. Ct. App. 1972)). This legal opinion, filed in 1972-03-23, from the Court of Appeals of Oregon discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/verburg-v-verburg--1121275"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/verburg-v-verburg--1121275","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Verburg v. Verburg, Court of Appeals of Oregon, Verburg v. Verburg, 8 Or. App. 524 (Or. Ct. App. 1972)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T4d7, PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court modifying a decree of divorce by reducing the alimony provision in the divorce decree. The divorce decree was entered in June of 1967. In June of 1969 the matter came before the same trial judge who granted the divorce decree on defendant’s motion for an order eliminating the alimony provision. The motion was denied and neither party appealed.

In August of 1971, the defendant again sought an order modifying the decree with respect to alimony. This motion was heard by a different trial judge. His order reducing (but not eliminating) the required alimony payments gives rise to this appeal. In so doing he relied upon events which had occurred prior to the 1969 hearing. This he had no authority to do.

Absent an appeal the order resulting from the 1969 hearing was final. The discretionary power of the trial judge in the instant hearing was limited to a consideration of any change of circumstances subsequent to the 1969 hearing. There were none.

Reversed.