History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mears v. Marshall
324 Or. 130
| Or. | 1996
|
Check Treatment
921 P.2d 966 (1996)
324 Or. 130

Janice M. MEARS, Petitioner on Review,
v.
William R. MARSHALL, M.D. and Collagen Corporation, Respondents on Review.

CC 9307-04839; CA A85078; SC S43073.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

On Petition for Review February 23, 1996.
Decided August 29, 1996.

Maureen Leonard and Kathryn J. Clarke, Portland, filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Eric J. Neiman, of Tooze Shenker Duden Creamer Frank & Hutchison, Portland, and Joe W. Redden, Jr., of Beck, Redden & Secrest, Houston, filed a response for respondent on review Collagen Corporation.

Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY, GRABER and DURHAM, JJ.[**]

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. ___, 116 S. Ct. 2240, 135 L. Ed. 2d 700 (1996).

NOTES

[**] Unis, J., retired June 30, 1996, and did not participate in this decision.

Case Details

Case Name: Mears v. Marshall
Court Name: Oregon Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 29, 1996
Citation: 324 Or. 130
Docket Number: CC 9307-04839 CA A85078 SC S43073
Court Abbreviation: Or.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.