History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cities of Hesston & Sedgwick v. Smrha
179 Kan. 72
| Kan. | 1956
|
Check Treatment
179 Kan. 72 (1956)
293 P.2d 241

CITIES OF HESSTON AND SEDGWICK, and HARVEY HENSLEY, CITIES OF BURRTON AND HALSTEAD, and THE CITY OF NEWTON, KANSAS, Appellees,
v.
R.V. SMRHA, Chief Engineer, Division of Water Resources, Kansas State Board of Agriculture, Topeka, Kansas, and THE CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, Appellants.

No. 39,890

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed January 28, 1956.

Warden L. Noe, special assistant attorney general, and William P. Timmerman, of Wichita, argued the cause, and Harold R. Fatzer, attorney general, Paul Wilson, assistant attorney general, Fred W. Aley, city attorney, Robert B. Morton, assistant city attorney, Edward F. Arn, and Richard F. Mullins, all of Wichita, were with them on the briefs for the appellants.

Kenneth G. Speir and J.G. Somers, both of Newton, argued the cause, and Vernon A. Stroberg, Herbert H. Sizemore, and Richard F. Hrdlicka, all of Newton, were with them on the briefs for the appellees.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

ROBB, J.:

This appeal is dismissed in accordance with the opinion and views expressed in City of McPherson v. Smrha, No. 39,873, this day decided.

Case Details

Case Name: Cities of Hesston & Sedgwick v. Smrha
Court Name: Supreme Court of Kansas
Date Published: Jan 28, 1956
Citation: 179 Kan. 72
Docket Number: 39,890
Court Abbreviation: Kan.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.