History
  • No items yet
midpage
Krasnov v. United States
355 U.S. 5
| SCOTUS | 1957
|
Check Treatment
355 U.S. 5 (1957)

KRASNOV ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 238.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 14, 1957.[*]
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

C. Brewster Rhoads for appellants in No. 238.

Robert L. Wright and Milton M. Gottesman for appellants in No. 254.

Joseph F. Padlon for appellant in No. 255.

Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Daniel M. Friedman and Joseph F. Tubridy for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

NOTES

[*] Together with No. 254, Comfy Manufacturing Co. et al. v. United States, and No. 255, Oppenheimer v. United States, also on appeals from the same court.

Case Details

Case Name: Krasnov v. United States
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 14, 1957
Citation: 355 U.S. 5
Docket Number: 238
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.