History
  • No items yet
midpage
Luckman v. Dunbar
10 L. Ed. 2d 125
| SCOTUS | 1963
|
Check Treatment
372 U.S. 708 (1963)

LUCKMAN
v.
DUNBAR, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.

No. 63, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 15, 1963.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and John S. McInerny, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.

Case Details

Case Name: Luckman v. Dunbar
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Apr 15, 1963
Citation: 10 L. Ed. 2d 125
Docket Number: 63 M
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.