History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moya v. DeBaca
1969 U.S. LEXIS 1173
| SCOTUS | 1969
|
Check Treatment
395 U.S. 825 (1969)

MOYA ET UX.
v.
DeBACA, DBA DeBACA & CO. CREDIT & COLLECTION AGENCY, ET AL.

No. 996, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 23, 1969.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO.

William G. Fitzpatrick, Jr., for appellants.

Claud S. Mann for DeBaca et al., and Boston E. Witt, Attorney General, and James V. Noble, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of New Mexico, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN would vacate the judgment and remand the case in light of Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View, ante, p. 337.

Case Details

Case Name: Moya v. DeBaca
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 23, 1969
Citation: 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1173
Docket Number: 996 M
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.