History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carlos v. New York
1969 U.S. LEXIS 103
| SCOTUS | 1969
|
Check Treatment
396 U.S. 119 (1969)

CARLOS
v.
NEW YORK.

No. 524.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 8, 1969.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.

Herald Price Fahringer and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed, Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. However, the case having been taken for review, they would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in MR. JUSTICE HARLAN'S separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496 (1957), and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455 (1966).

Case Details

Case Name: Carlos v. New York
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Dec 8, 1969
Citation: 1969 U.S. LEXIS 103
Docket Number: 524
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.