History
  • No items yet
midpage
Buckley v. Ohio by Barbuto
395 U.S. 163
| SCOTUS | 1969
|
Check Treatment
395 U.S. 163 (1969)

BUCKLEY ET AL., DBA BUCKLEY'S AUTO WRECKING
v.
OHIO BY BARBUTO.

No. 1209.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 19, 1969.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.

Edward D. Wyner for appellants.

Paul W. Brown, Attorney General of Ohio, pro se, and Robert D. Macklin, Assistant Attorney General, for the Attorney General of Ohio, and James V. Barbuto, pro se, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Buckley v. Ohio by Barbuto
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: May 19, 1969
Citation: 395 U.S. 163
Docket Number: 1209
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.